Posted by redrose64 at
By CLIFTON ADCOCK World Staff Writer
Published: 6/29/2010 3:25 PM
Last Modified: 6/29/2010 4:02 PM
OKLAHOMA CITY — The Oklahoma State Board of Education voted unanimously on Tuesday to pass a budget that pulled funding from several educational programs.
The budget represents an 8.5 percent, or nearly $39 million, cut to the Oklahoma State Department of Education’s Programs and Activities fund.
The job of appropriating $419 million in funds for the separate programs fell to the board because the Legislature took the unusual step of not including any line-item funding measures for specific education programs when it passed the budget for next fiscal year, said State Superintendent Sandy Garrett.
“In 22 years, in this office or in the governor’s office, I’ve never seen anything like this,” Garrett said.
Among those programs not receiving any money from the programs and activities fund next fiscal year are:
# Mentor teacher stipends
# Driver education
# Academic achievement awards
# AG in the classroom
# Oklahoma ambassador of teaching
# Rural Infant stimulation environment
# Recreation therapy grants
# Teacher retirement credit
Other programs are taking cuts as well, such as:
# Staff development — cut $7.8 million and funded $8.5 million.
# Alternative and High Challenge Education — cut $2.5 million and funded $17.2 million.
# Instructional Co-op Technical Education — cut $185,017, funded $300,000.
# Early Intervention/Sooner Start — cut $2.6 million, funded $13.8 million.
The cuts
mean that many of the programs will not be offered or will be curtailed this year, officials said.
Though driver education will lose its $442,547 from the program and activities fund, it also has a second state funding source that it did not spend all of last year, State Department of Education officials said, so the program will not be cut.
However, other programs that rely exclusively on money from the programs and activities fund will not be around next year, such as the Academic Achievement Awards, the Arts Component of Alternative Education, arts grants, Ambassador of Teaching (which funds a full time teacher to fill in for State Teacher of the Year), Recreation Therapy and the Math Improvement Program.
Other programs are expected to continue operating, but will no longer receive money from the fund, such as AG in the Classroom –which is expected to be instead funded by Oklahoma State University.
While the programs that won’t be funded through the Department of Education’s program and activities fund might not get money this year, they won’t necessarily be done away with for good, Garrett said.
She said the programs will hopefully be funded again within two years when the economy improves.
The budget passed Tuesday does not affect state aid given to individual school districts for their general funds.
Under the budget, however, teacher and support staff health benefits, would receive more funding. In January, insurance premiums rose by 8 percent, while funding for those benefits dropped by more than 7 percent, Garrett said, meaning that individual school districts had to pick up the tab to pay for the benefits.
Under the proposed budget, which has yet to be written into final draft form, the Oklahoma Department of Education would fund 100 percent of certified teacher benefits and 93.5 percent of support staff benefits, including an expected 3.33 percent rise in premiums this year.
The budget reflects the most responsible approach to program funding under the current circumstances, Garrett said, by not jeopardizing federal matching funds on school lunch and other programs and by affecting student learning and teachers as little as possible.
Both Garrett and board members voiced frustration at the Legislature for not writing instructions for the appropriation and for legislation that allows schools to be more lax in maintaining accreditation standards.
The “unique” budget with no line items “delivers it to our doorstep to do the dirty work of telling all of these worthy programs, worthy professionals and school children of Oklahoma what our elected leadership would not do, which is our priority is not education,” said board member Tim Gilpin of Tulsa. “What they’re saying is that our priority is to pass a faux budget and pass the responsibility on to you … to deliver the bad news.”
The program funding cuts and loosened standards will cause more teachers to look for work out of state and harm education in the state, Gilpin said.
“Then we’ll wonder one day why our Legislature spent their time talking about a variety of other issues except for education and why our kids can’t read, can’t compete, can’t add or subtract,” he said.
Challenge to colleges
State Superintendent Sandy Garrett called for colleges of education around the state to help pay for some of the teacher development programs that are experiencing funding cuts.
“I think it’s a darn shame that colleges of education don’t help with these programs,” Garrett said. “I’m challenging them to help. If you’re going to take the credit and write about them, put your money where your mouth is. These are for teachers.”